
A PLAN FORWHAT COMES NEXT.
For generations, America has debated what should be done about one of the most consequential chapters in its history.
The U.S.–Transatlantic 7-Year Peace & Return Accord proposes a different question:
“What if those who want to remain Americans remain Americans—and those qualifying descendants who desire another future are given a voluntary pathway to choose one?”
A historic settlement. Permanent repatriation. National restoration. Covenant restoration. And the beginning of a new relationship between the United States and the proposed Nation of the Hebrews.
SEVEN YEARS. ONE COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK. A PERMANENT CHOICE.
Four figures define the proposed seven-year framework.
INDIVIDUAL SETTLEMENT · NATIONAL CAPACITY
$1 MILLION
PER QUALIFYING PARTICIPANT
The Accord proposes a $1 million individual settlement for each qualifying descendant who voluntarily elects participation and completes the legally authorized process contemplated by the proposal.
$50 BILLION
INFRASTRUCTURE & NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Water · Energy · Transportation · Communications · Healthcare · Sanitation · Logistics · Public Facilities · Housing-Enabling Infrastructure · Economic Development
$10 BILLION
EDUCATION & HUMAN CAPITAL
Teachers · Engineers · Physicians · Nurses · Builders · Technicians · Administrators · Entrepreneurs · Skilled Trades
LEARN THE SKILL. · PRACTICE THE SKILL.
PERFORM THE WORK. · BUILD THE NATION.
$7 BILLION
SEVEN-YEAR SECURITY PARTNERSHIP
The proposal calls for $1 billion annually for seven years, subject to negotiation and lawful authorization, to assist the development of professional institutions and national capability during the founding period.
THE $1 MILLION INDIVIDUAL SETTLEMENT IS SEPARATE FROM THE $67 BILLION NATIONAL FOUNDING FRAMEWORK.
$50B INFRASTRUCTURE + $10B EDUCATION & HUMAN CAPITAL + $7B SECURITY = $67B NATIONAL CAPACITY
FOUR NUMBERS.TWO DISTINCT PURPOSES.ONE SEVEN-YEAR FRAMEWORK.
BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT BUILDING A NATION, FIRST LOCATE THE LAND.
WHERE ISBIR TAWIL?
Bir Tawil lies in northeastern Africa along the Egypt–Sudan border region, east of the Nile and west of the Red Sea.
For readers unfamiliar with Bir Tawil, its location becomes much easier to understand when viewed in relation to places they already know.

EAST OF THE NILE. BETWEEN EGYPT AND SUDAN. WEST OF THE RED SEA.
THIS IS BIR TAWIL.

BIR TAWIL.
A PROPOSAL FOR A HOMELAND ESTABLISHED THROUGH NEGOTIATION.
The Accord identifies Bir Tawil as the proposed sovereign homeland and national headquarters of the proposed Nation of the Hebrews. It calls for a diplomatic process involving Egypt, Sudan, the United States, and representatives of the proposed nation to examine the territorial, legal, diplomatic, access, infrastructure, transportation, trade, aviation, security, movement, and recognition frameworks necessary for such an outcome.
NEGOTIATION.NOT CONQUEST.
FIRST, BUILDTHE NATION.THEN MOVETHE PEOPLE.
The Accord proposes that population growth follow demonstrated receiving capacity—not the calendar alone. Infrastructure, institutions, services, employment, and essential systems must be capable of receiving people before settlement expands.
POPULATION FOLLOWS CAPACITY.

FIRST THE SYSTEMS. THEN THE SCALE.
The founding workforce contemplated by the Accord emphasizes engineers, builders, water specialists, electricians, healthcare professionals, educators, logistics personnel, administrators, entrepreneurs, emergency personnel, and other capacity-builders needed to establish and operate essential infrastructure, institutions, and services.
POPULATION GROWS ACCORDING TO DEMONSTRATED CAPACITY.
NOT JUST HOUSES. COMPLETE COMMUNITIES.
The Accord proposes development through complete communities designed to place housing, employment, education, healthcare, markets, public services, mobility, utilities, digital connectivity, and community life within a functioning local system.

A COMMUNITY IS MORE THAN A COLLECTION OF HOMES.
Its scale and form would be adjusted to geography, infrastructure, water availability, economic function, and demonstrated receiving capacity. The objective is to develop places where the systems of ordinary life exist together—not settlements that require those systems to be added later.

PEOPLE SHOULDN'T JUST HAVESOMEWHERE TO LIVE.THEY SHOULD HAVESOMEWHERE TO BUILD A LIFE.
Complete communities are intended to create the conditions for ordinary life to flourish—where homes, opportunity, education, healthcare, commerce, recreation, and community exist together.
BUILD AN ECONOMYTHAT CAN OUTLIVETHE FOUNDING PERIOD.
The Accord proposes using the founding period not simply to construct infrastructure, but to develop the human and economic capacity required for long-term independence—skilled trades, professional services, local enterprise, manufacturing, artisanship, technology, agriculture, logistics and entrepreneurship.

THE GOAL IS NOT
PERMANENT
ASSISTANCE.THE GOAL IS
PERMANENT CAPACITY.
From local businesses and professional services to manufacturing, agriculture, technology and trade, the proposed complete-community model is intended to create real opportunity—where people can work, create, own, produce and build generational wealth.

AND THENTHERE ISTEL ARAD.
A SEPARATE PROPOSAL. A SEPARATE NEGOTIATION.
A DIFFERENT PURPOSE.
The Accord separately proposes negotiations with Israel concerning approximately 25 acres comprising the lower city of Tel Arad. Israel would retain sovereignty and applicable regulatory jurisdiction, while the proposal seeks examination and negotiation of a covenant-stewardship framework, subject to agreement and applicable Israeli law.

TWO DISTINCT NEGOTIATIONS.ONE LARGER VISION.
THIS ISN'T AFOREVER PROGRAM.IT HAS AN EXIT.
The Accord proposes extraordinary founding support for a defined transition period, with the objective of developing sufficient national capacity so extraordinary assistance can end rather than becoming permanent dependency.
THE END OF EXTRAORDINARY ASSISTANCEIS NOT INTENDED TO MEANTHE END OF THE RELATIONSHIP.
SEVEN YEARSTO STAND.
The Accord proposes a sequenced national founding period—not a race against the calendar.
THE CALENDAR DOESN'T
GET THE FINAL WORD.
Progression depends on demonstrated capacity, not simply the passage of time. Each stage is evaluated against clear benchmarks to determine if the next phase should advance, pause, or be adjusted.
CAPACITY READY?
FAILURE AT A GATE PRODUCES CORRECTION—NOT AUTOMATIC ADVANCEMENT.
SEVEN YEARS PROVIDE THE FRAMEWORK.READINESS DETERMINES THE PACE.
WHAT DOESAMERICA GET?
The Accord proposes the possibility of a long-term, mutually beneficial U.S.–Hebrew relationship built on shared interests, stability, economic opportunity and global cooperation.
THE ACCORD DOES NOT PROMISE AMERICA ANOTHER NATION'S RESOURCES, CONTRACTS OR COMMERCIAL OUTCOMES.
IT PROPOSES THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW COMMERCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC PARTNERSHIP.
Extraordinary cooperation helps establish capacity.
The objective becomes ordinary relationships between nations—commerce, investment, diplomacy, enterprise and trade.
INVESTMENT. ENTERPRISE. PRODUCTION. TRADE.
AND YES.WE THOUGHTABOUT THE MONEY.
A proposal of this scale cannot rely on trust alone. The Accord proposes distinct funding streams, defined financial roles, segregation of funds, independent oversight and traceable controls.
ADMINISTRATOR
Administers the authorized process
CUSTODIAN
Holds and safeguards funds
AUDITOR
Independently examines the system
ADMINISTRATOR
Administers the authorized process
CUSTODIAN
Holds and safeguards funds
AUDITOR
Independently examines the system
PARTICIPANT REMAINS THE RECIPIENT.
ACCOUNTABILITY

A COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL BUILT TO ADDRESS THE QUESTIONS THAT FOLLOW A DECISION THIS LARGE.
THIS ISN’TTHE 1,151-PAGE ACCORD.THIS IS THE INVITATION TO READ IT.
THE FIRST ASK ISN’T“APPROVE EVERYTHING.”IT’S“OPEN THE PROCESS.”
DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE ACCORD REQUIRE DIFFERENT LAWFUL PATHS.
THE PRESIDENT
Can initiate formal examination, diplomatic engagement and executive-branch review within lawful authority.
CONGRESS
Would be necessary for legislative matters, appropriations and other actions requiring congressional authorization.
EGYPT & SUDAN
Would be necessary parties to the proposed diplomatic process concerning Bir Tawil and related territorial/access arrangements.
ISRAEL
Would be necessary for any proposed negotiation concerning Tel Arad.
THE PRESIDENT
Can initiate formal examination, diplomatic engagement and executive-branch review within lawful authority.
CONGRESS
Would be necessary for legislative matters, appropriations and other actions requiring congressional authorization.
EGYPT & SUDAN
Would be necessary parties to the proposed diplomatic process concerning Bir Tawil and related territorial/access arrangements.
ISRAEL
Would be necessary for any proposed negotiation concerning Tel Arad.
THE PRESIDENT
Can initiate formal examination, diplomatic engagement and executive-branch review within lawful authority.
CONGRESS
Would be necessary for legislative matters, appropriations and other actions requiring congressional authorization.
EGYPT & SUDAN
Would be necessary parties to the proposed diplomatic process concerning Bir Tawil and related territorial/access arrangements.
ISRAEL
Would be necessary for any proposed negotiation concerning Tel Arad.
PUT IT ON THE TABLE.
THE PRINCIPLES THAT HOLD THE FRAMEWORK TOGETHER
ONEACCORD.
Different provisions. Different negotiations. Different institutions. One governing framework.
VOLUNTARYINDIVIDUAL CHOICE
NEGOTIATEDSOVEREIGNTY
BUILD BEFOREMASS SETTLEMENT
POPULATIONFOLLOWS CAPACITY
ACCOUNTABILITY WITHOUTPERMANENT DEPENDENCY
PARTNERSHIPWITHOUT CONQUEST
EVIDENCE BEFOREIRREVERSIBLE DECISIONS
TEMPORARYAUTHORITY ENDS
PERMANENTCAPACITY REMAINS
VOLUNTARYINDIVIDUAL CHOICE
NEGOTIATEDSOVEREIGNTY
BUILD BEFOREMASS SETTLEMENT
POPULATIONFOLLOWS CAPACITY
ACCOUNTABILITY WITHOUTPERMANENT DEPENDENCY
PARTNERSHIPWITHOUT CONQUEST
EVIDENCE BEFOREIRREVERSIBLE DECISIONS
TEMPORARYAUTHORITY ENDS
PERMANENTCAPACITY REMAINS
VOLUNTARY INDIVIDUAL CHOICE
NEGOTIATED SOVEREIGNTY
BUILD BEFORE MASS SETTLEMENT
POPULATION FOLLOWS CAPACITY
ACCOUNTABILITY WITHOUT PERMANENT DEPENDENCY
PARTNERSHIP WITHOUT CONQUEST
EVIDENCE BEFORE IRREVERSIBLE DECISIONS
TEMPORARY AUTHORITY ENDS
PERMANENT CAPACITY REMAINS
THE DETAILS MAY BE NEGOTIATED.
THE PRINCIPLESHOLD.THE PRINCIPLES HOLD.
THE PURPOSE OF THE ACCORD
ONE CHAPTER CAN END.ANOTHER CAN BEGIN.
The Accord is not asking America simply to help a people leave.
It proposes something considerably larger:
SETTLETHE PAST.
CREATE APATHWAY HOME.
BUILD THE CAPACITYFOR A NATIONTO STAND.
TRANSFORM AHISTORIC RELATIONSHIPINTO A NEW ONEBETWEEN PEOPLES.
SETTLETHE PAST.
CREATE APATHWAY HOME.
BUILD THE CAPACITYFOR A NATIONTO STAND.
TRANSFORM AHISTORIC RELATIONSHIPINTO A NEW ONEBETWEEN PEOPLES.
THE SETTLEMENT IS DESIGNED TO END.
THE RELATIONSHIPIT CREATES MAY ENDURE.
READ IT. EXAMINE IT. PUT IT ON THE TABLE.
